On Feb. 2, health officials in Pennsylvania said at least
35 people in four states were struck with a bacterial infection after
drinking unpasteurized "raw" milk, the same day a New Jersey legislative
committee approved a bill to allow raw milk sales in that state.
Martin Wiedmann and Rob Ralyea, Cornell University researchers and
experts on food safety, comment and the danger presented to farmers and
consumers by the raw milk movement.
Rob Ralyea is a senior extension associate with the Milk Quality
Improvement Program in the Department of Food Science. On Feb. 2, he
testified before the New Jersey State Assembly's Agriculture and Natural
Resources Committee about the dangers of raw milk.
"While some people think allowing sales of raw milk is in the best
interest of the farmers, it's inherently not in these situations.
"Farms risk losing a lot, including the farm, for the few dollars
more they get when selling raw milk. There is currently a lawsuit in
Washington for $2.4 million as a result of raw milk illness, so there is
a liability when an illness can be traced to a farm. We wear seatbelts
because they have been proven to reduce injuries and deaths in auto
accidents. Pasteurization does the same thing as it relates to public
health and consuming milk.
"A proven public health mechanism is completely removed in this case
and anything can happen, as is illustrated once again in Pennsylvania."
Martin Wiedmann is a professor of food science and a doctor of
veterinary medicine and also directs the Cornell Milk Quality
Improvement Program. Wiedmann's research focuses on the transmission of
bacterial and food-borne diseases and dairy food safety and quality.
"Raw milk represents a considerable risk for consumers, who may
experience severe food-borne diseases that can be transmitted through
raw milk - including diarrhea, brain infections, abortions and chronic
neurological diseases.
"Farmers who sell raw milk also take a considerable risk - if raw
milk sold by a given farm causes human disease, farmers are likely to be
sued by lawyers specializing in food-borne disease litigation and may
have to pay millions of dollars to disease victims.
No comments:
Post a Comment